Sunday, February 06, 2005

Security Trends

From Anonymous:

So, the December, 2004 Physics Today LANL safety article pretty much put to rest the myth that LANL had bad, deteriorating safety trends.

The recently released FBI report pretty much put to rest the myth that a really bad CREM security incident had occurred at LANL.

What about LANL's security incident trends? What about LANL's security incident trends as compared to other facilities in the DOE complex? Anybody want to take a whack at that?

Oh, in case nobody noticed, paragraphs 1) and 2) above pretty much put to rest the myth that Nanos had good reasons for shutting down the entire laboratory last July. If someone can show that security trends at LANL were also healthy, then that should be the final nail in Nanos' coffin, shouldn't it? How many Goddamn nails should a coffin need, for crying out loud.




Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?