Thursday, January 27, 2005
Bingaman comments on RFP
From the Los Alamos Monitor:
Thursday, January 27, 2005
Thursday, January 27, 2005
|
Comments:
<< Home
Why has no one jumped on Bingaman's comments about the security fence encompassing the Research Park? This land was given to Los Alamos County as part of the settlement between the County and the DOE rather than having the DOE provide assistance payments every year. The idea was for the County become more self-sufficient via businesses located in the Research Park that were cooperating with LANL projects.
The actions of the DOE are extremely similar to those of the US Government in their dealings with Native Americans, with the Hispanics who farmed on the Pajarito Plateau, and with the ranchers in the Tularosa Baisin. The DOE suffers from a real image problem and is wasting much of the taxpayers' dollars shifting their poor image to LANL, hoping that no one will notice that what they give with one hand they take with the other.
The LANL problem is much bigger than Nanos. The problem is the middle-level bureaucrats at the DOE who are more interested in justifyng their jobs than actually accomplishing anything. The health and safety of our family and friends in the Jemez, the econimic stability of our community, even our very existence is not as important to them as imagining every possible security scenario and trying to protect TA-3 from every possible method of attack without any real data. Of course, what can you expect from an agency that fails to fund expansion of the red network and then dumps all the blame for 2 missing barcodes on LANL and UC. Those two barcodes cost UC how much money each?
Post a Comment
The actions of the DOE are extremely similar to those of the US Government in their dealings with Native Americans, with the Hispanics who farmed on the Pajarito Plateau, and with the ranchers in the Tularosa Baisin. The DOE suffers from a real image problem and is wasting much of the taxpayers' dollars shifting their poor image to LANL, hoping that no one will notice that what they give with one hand they take with the other.
The LANL problem is much bigger than Nanos. The problem is the middle-level bureaucrats at the DOE who are more interested in justifyng their jobs than actually accomplishing anything. The health and safety of our family and friends in the Jemez, the econimic stability of our community, even our very existence is not as important to them as imagining every possible security scenario and trying to protect TA-3 from every possible method of attack without any real data. Of course, what can you expect from an agency that fails to fund expansion of the red network and then dumps all the blame for 2 missing barcodes on LANL and UC. Those two barcodes cost UC how much money each?
<< Home
